Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Review of Chapter 27- Seeing Green: Knowing and Saving the Environment on Film

The Fantasies of Natural History Film



The use of film as a source of media to spread the word about environmental concerns can be very useful as you get a visual picture of what is happening to the natural world. The destruction of the natual world can be viewed and heard throuhg the use of film. I remember when I was growing up that I would watch the "Wild America" film series, and would be amazed at how animals fight for surrvival. If they (animals) do not put in effort to find food, they will not eat. The natural world is a tough and unforegiving place. Marty Stouffer is the director of the "Wild America" series http://shopping.discovery.com/DiscoveryStore/images/products/largenew/775270_lg.jpg . According to the text he would damage the natural world with his film crew destroying the land as they filmed on location in the animal of topic's natural realm, and they would torture animals to make them perform on video. Apparently it is very hard to find animals performing exciting hunting manuvers, and to film it in a graceful pleasurable way is also very difficult as animals do not cater to the film crew and performing within the frame of the picture being recorded. So, are nature films about documenting animals for scientific research, or are they about entertainment?



On page 108 of the text it refers to nature films as origanally being shot for "scientific records that preserve a natural heritage being lost to the forces of modernity (Mitman 1999:60)." When we "stage nature" for the excitment of the film we risk the validity of the scientific record of the film.



My favorite quote from the book

Author of the book Reel Nature: America's Romance with Wildlife on Film by Greg Mitman (1999). "Nature is not all action...Conditioned by nature on screen, we may fail to develop the patience, perseverance, and passion required to participate in the natural world with all its mundanity as well as splendor." In the time that I was a young boy I would watch wild nature documentaries all of the time, so much so that I thought if you were to step foot outside eventually an animal is going to attack you. This notion of wild animals is not true, because animals will only attack you if you if you fall into a certain category such as, Are you endangering the animal's offspring? Do you look like their natural prey? Is the animal suffering from a dibilitating disease? For more answers



When we watch too many fictional shows as uneducated children or adults, we generally will believe what we see as a constant truth. For example, many believe that seeing a wolf in the wild means they will attack you immediatly with no hesitation. This notion is untrue as animals generally only attack humans out of extreme hunger. If the ecosystem is in balance then the predators will not always attack the prey in that ecosystem. The predators will only eat the sick and dead. The balance of an ecosystem is very important to maintain this is why killing off species is so detrimental to the planet and its ecosytems.









New Concepts


The bias of the filmmaker. "Since the Company Came" (Hawkins, 2000) Does the film only involve one side of the story? If so, then does that bias show a certain side to make money off of the issue to use scare tatitics to elicit more sales of their video as it brings on the issue of what is a bigger concern. Save the environment or make some money?





What I took from this reading

It is very hard to understand those people (Hafori) in another area of the world, and how their economy is so dependant on the logging industry. It would be hard to tell a big buisness to not give your people jobs as it hurts the environment. Some areas of the world are not as econmically diverse as the United States. The situation would be a delicate one as there is so much to be gained (economic), and so much to be lost (ecosystem).

The use of film in media can give its audience a first hand look at every situation you maybe only glance at in the newspaper. Film can bring to light many parts, some not so well known, and some very well known topics. It is important to remember when you are watching the movie that you try and decipher all of the sides of the story. Who and what effect each other and remember for every action there is a re-action/result.


Additional Resources






Logging the forrest, everything you need to know about how, what, and why





For the environmentally friendly Tree Hugger, this website shows every angle of how we can save the environment from food, to business and politics.




Definitions


Ecosystems- An ecosystem is a natural unit consisting of all plants, animals and micro-organisms (bioitc factors) in an area functioning together with all of the non-living physical (abiotic) factors of the environment



Haforai- The Haforai people live in a very remote part of the world, Rendova in the Solomon Islands. Location of Solomon Islands the archipelago of Solomon Islands is located in the southern region of the Pacific Ocean. Papua New Guinea is the nearest big land mass northwest of it. The Solomon Islands are a part of the group of islands better known as Oceania. The continent of Australia lies a little further off, south west of it. The water bodies, aside of the South Pacific Ocean that surrounds the Solomon Islands are the Solomon Sea, the Coral Sea and the Arafura Sea.


Shamanism- Shamanism is a range of traditional beliefs and practices concerned with communication with the spirit world.


Ecotourism- is a form of tourism, that appeals to ecologically and socially conscious individuals. Generally speaking, ecotourism focuses on volunteering, personal growth and learning new ways to live on the planet. It typically involves travel to destinations where flora, fauna and cultural heritage are the primary attractions. Ecotourism is a conceptual experience, enriching those who delve into researching and understanding the environment around them. It gives us insight into our impacts, as human beings and also a greater appreciation of our own natural habitats.







25 comments:

  1. I thought you made a good point in saying it's hard for us in the U.S. to put ourselves in the shoes of someone in a completely different culture and tell them to change their industry (as in the case of the Hafori and the logging scenario). You also gave very good advice about trying to understand films from multiple angles and not just taking them at face value.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kevin,
    Smart advice to not take documentaries at face value. I don't think I was ever worried about, whether these kinds of shows were giving me accurate information or false. Hopefully we all smarten up and learn to have a group effort globally to conserve the resources that are so important to us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, very nice job at portraying some important concepts. Ya know, I have never thought about nature movies and/or shows in terms of "howd they get the animal to do that?!?!" But instead Ive always taken it just for what I see on screen. It made me think about the damages they really are causing when shooting movies and documentaries like that. I like how you broke it down into the fact that animals attack in needed situations, and they naturally will eat the sick and old...as a natural way of life, not because they are brutal beasts! Good work :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kevin,

    I really liked how you put this post together. You managed to summarize by breaking it down and incorporate you own personal thoughts and opinions in. I like the quote you stated. Growing up we tend to believe what we see on tv as uneducated children and it almost tends to mold on how we view things. Also, I agree with you when are watching a movie or learning information, it's improtant to understand ALL sides of the story. Great work!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kevin
    That quote that you put as your favorite quote was a really good one! I didn't really watch many of those kind of shows when I was a kid, but I know my brother did. And I'm sure he thought this was how the "real world" was! I think it's really important to make sure children are getting accurate information about the environment, as they will be the ones living in it and taking care of it soon! When I was younger, i don't ever really remember hearing a lot about it, or why it was important to keep it safe and healthy. I kind of regret that now that I am older. I think the more we can learn at a young age, the better. Great Post Kevin!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you did a really great job on your review! I like that you set your post up a little different from other peoples. I like that you included your favorite quote, and then tied it into what you thought about animals as a little boy. I also really liked how you talked about the damages to the environment and animals that occur while filming. That really makes me sad. I didn't know that that happened. As I watched these shows as a kid, I always thought that the shows showed the real life of that aminal, I never thought that what I was seeing wasn't really real.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kevin-
    Your post was very well organized and put together. I liked the section where you talked about your favorite quote. I think it's important to learn about important issues (like the environment) at a young age so we can grow up and take action. Nice work on your post, I also enjoyed the tree hugger website!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kevin,
    Great job I feel like your blog was very descriptive and I specifically enjoyed the linked terms as well as the introduction when you talked about the video series you watched while growing up. In addition to that I thought the quote from the book ""scientific records that preserve a natural heritage being lost to the forces of modernity (Mitman 1999:60)." When we "stage nature" for the excitment of the film we risk the validity of the scientific record of the film." was really interesting. It made me think I thought about this concept as I was reading other blogs but not really in the terms of validity or "staging nature" and it set me off thinking in a new direction!
    Great job this week Kevin!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kevin,
    The question you had in the beginning of your post: "are nature films about documenting animals for scientific research, or are they about entertainment?" I think this is the central question relating to this chapter. It is kind of bizzare to think that these film makers are "staging" nature for the pure enjoyment of the audience. It really put things into perspective for me. I think you made some good points about this chapter. I liked that you stated specific quotes that you thought were interesting and stated what you specifically got out of the reading. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey Kevin!

    After reading the article, I too was shocked by the filming methods used in "natural" environments. I also grew up loving to watch nature films about animal survival. I know now why it was all so appealing...it was designed for entertainment! The action was enhanced with music and stimulation of the animals for the desired results. In addition, all the filming was done while destroying the natural habitat of the animals! Now I will think twice about the filming methods while viewing a film about animals in their natural habitat!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey Kevin-
    I really liked how you put your post together. I really thought it was interesting how you separated your post into terms and what you thought was interesting. I feel like children get the wrong idea at times and are not shown the truth which is very important.
    Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  12. This blog was great at showing the information you needed to get out of the chapter. The definitions were very clear and easy to read. Your favorite quote from the book was funny and true it would have been my favorite too. Overall I really liked the way you put everything together.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kevin,

    I completely agree with you that if we do watch a lot of fictional shows growing up or watch something with false/edited information, that's what we're going to believe. For film editors to change, edit and script what's going on in nature, that's not real and it's not something that we should believe. To know what needs to be done to change our environment, sometimes it take the good hard truth. Sometimes, that's the only thing that can help motivate change and create action.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kevin-
    Your blog was well organized and it was easy to follow. The section where you talked about your favorite quote from the book, was really interesting. I think it was very eye opening. When you think about what you learned as a child and how it effects your opinions now is really interesting. I think that if we can start to inform kids while they are still young, on how to protect the environment, a lot of good can come of it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. good job on your review. It is well organzied and easy to read. You also added your own opinions in a fashioned manner. Good point on how our childhood molds the way we think. That is so true. I never really have thought about it that way until now. Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Kevin- I think you're right that it is hard for us to understand how the logging is so huge over in other countries and how they rely on it, because it doesn't affect us in that way. When I see or hear of things like that and how they debate on cutting of their contract with those companies I don't understand how it could even be a question when it is causing that much harm to the environment, but I am not in their situation. It is really hard to realte to. I really liked that you picked a favorite quote from the reading and elaborated on it! I think that is a really cool idea!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Kevin- I like the way you started this blog out. I had never heard of the "Wild America" series. It sounds pretty horrible if you ask me.
    You are right though, it amounts to using this valuable resource of documentary, and turning it into entertainment. So unnecessary.
    The link to the tree hugger website you provided was really great. I also really appreciated the layout of this post. It was easy to navigate through. Great job!! --S

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hey Kevin,

    Isn't it insane to think about how Marty Stouffer and his crew were practically forcing animals to act in ways so that they could simply catch it on film. Whats the point if trying to show people the real side of nature if you are forcing actions. Great layout of your review!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hey Kevin!
    Great post.
    I have never watched the Wild America series, sounds interesting!
    It was interesting to read that quote because truely, with entertainment, we don't have the patience, perseverence, and passion to really get the real thing. And also the question- Save the environment? or make some money? Of course filmmakers will be choosing the money. Where are the people with passion? The ones who will honestly show an environmental film.
    It seems as if economics and ecosystems will always be like water and oil. Will there ever be a happy medium?
    Thanks for putting up additional sites and defining and linking the terms.
    Overall, great site and post Kevin!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Kevin- You made some good points on what they really do get the animals to do what they do in films...I do remember watching a show or something on that and it totally ruins the whole film in my option. Once again they are in the money making business so they will do what ever they need to get the rates they need to make the pay cut!

    p.s. I liked how you posted the picture of the video you were talking about...cause I do a lot better with a picture than a title sometimes!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Heya Kevin. Cool picture first off. Marty Stouffer's Wild America, I can still hear him reading off the title at the start of the shows. And I never knew about all the back-story stuff about his show. I never really would have thought it. Otherwise, great review, and great job with making it easy to read and having good links. Have a good one

    ReplyDelete
  22. Kevin,

    I really like how you include both parts of the story. Unlike everyone else, you bring up the fact that many people will lose their jobs if we outlaw logging and other jobs that are potentially environmentally harmful. It's really a dilemma that needs attention and rational solutions.

    I also liked the quote you emphasized about how nature isn't all action, but also patience, perseverance, and passion. When I was little I also felt like any wild animal would attack me whenever they had a chance lol. But what is truly sad is the fact that so many animals are stereotyped for being "man eaters" or "man hunters." Sure there are 50-100 shark attacks every year, but how many sharks are killed by humans annually? The difference is shocking, and sad.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hey Kevin!

    Great post! I liked the way you personalized it at the beginning by telling us that you used to watch Marty Stouffer's Wild America. That is an an awesome example to go along with the reading that you were reviewing. The picture you put up was also a plus!

    I agree with you one hundred percent about having a hard time understanding people from other parts of the world. It is never easy to try and put yourself in someone else's shoes.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Kevin, great post! You did a good job at portraying some of the concepts addressed throughout the review. I love watching Planet Earth and I never guessed that they were made up. I did wonder how they caught the animals on tape doing all the hunting and whatever. While reading this, I also thought about how much I take everything I see for granted. Lastly, great job outlining the review maybe for next time you could put a few less spaces between the paragraphs. Otherwise, Great work=)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Great review. I think you had a good outline that made your post easy to read. I think you made some good points from both sides of the argument, jobs will most likely be lost, but there are also posibilities that new jobs will be made. Great points!

    ReplyDelete